Currently registerDevice() adds a device to in-memory table, saves metadata
and also updates the pool transaction ID.
Now move transaciton Id update out of registerDevice() and provide a new
function unregisterDevice() which does the reverse of registerDevice().
This will simplify some code down the line and make it more structured.
This is just code reorganization and should not change functionality.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Currently devicemapper CreateDevice and CreateSnapDevice keep on retrying
device creation till a suitable device id is found.
With new transaction mechanism we need to store device id in transaction
before it has been created.
So change the logic in such a way that caller decides the devices Id to
use. If that device Id is not available, caller bumps up the device Id
and retries.
That way caller can update transaciton too when it tries a new Id. Transaction
related patches will come later in the series.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
When we are deleting a device, we also delete associated metadata file. If
that file removal fails, we are adding back the device in in-memory
table. I really can't see what's the point. When next lookup takes place
it will be automatically loaded if need be. Remove that code.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Right now initMetaData() first queries the pool for current transaciton Id
and then it migrates the old metafile.
Move pool transaction Id query and file migration in separate functions
for better code reuse and organization.
Given we have removed device transaction Id dependency from saveMetaData(),
we don't have to query pool transaction Id before migrating files.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Right now saveMetaData() is kind of little overloaded function. It is
supposed to save file metadata to disk. But in addition if user has
bumped up NewTransactionId before calling saveMetaData(), then it will
also update the transaction ID in pool.
Keep saveMetaData() simple and let it just save the file. Any update
of pool transaction ID is done inline in the code which needs it.
Also create an helper function updatePoolTransactionId() to update pool
transaction Id.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Remove call to allocateTransactionId() during device removal. This seems to
be unnecessary and it is not clear what this call is doing.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Again, just because device transaction id is greater than pool transaction
id, it does not guarantee that device is in the pool. So do not check
of this during loading of device metadata.
Docker needs to deal with it. And device activation will fail when we try
to activate a device for whom metafile is present but there is no device
in the pool.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Current code is associating a transaction id with each device and if pool
transaction id is greater that value, then current code assumes that device
is there in pool.
Transaction id of pool is a mechanism so that during device creation and
removal one can define a transaction and during startup figure out if
transaction was complete or not. I think we are using transaction id
throughout the code little inappropriately.
For example, if a device is being deleted, it is possible that we deleted
the device from pool but before we could delete metafile docker crashed.
When docker comes back it will think that device is in the pool (due to
device transaction id being less than pool transaction id) but device
is not in the pool.
Similary, it could happen that some data in the pool is corrupted and
during pool repair some devices are lost (without docker knowing about
it). In that case tool pool transaction id will be higher than device
transaction id and there are no guaratees that device is actually in
the pool.
So move away from this model where we think that a device is in pool if pool
transaction id is greater than device transaction Id. Per device
transaction Id just says that after device creation this should be pool's
transaction Id and nothing more.
Transaction id is per pool property (as opposed to per device property) and
will be used internally to figure out if last transaction was complete or
not and recover from failure during docker startup.
If for some reason metafile is present but device is not in pool, then
device activation will fail later.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
I noticed that 3 of the tarsum test cases had expected a tarsum with
a sha256 hash of
e3b0c44298fc1c149afbf4c8996fb92427ae41e4649b934ca495991b7852b855
As I've been working with sha256 quite a bit lately, it struck me that
this is the initial digest value for sha256, which means that no data
was processed. However, these tests *do* process data. It turns out that
there was a bug in the test handling code which did not wait for tarsum
to end completely. This patch corrects these test cases.
I'm unaware of anywhere else in the code base where this would be an issue,
though we definitily need to look out in the future to ensure we are
completing tarsum reads (waiting for EOF).
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Josh Hawn <josh.hawn@docker.com> (github: jlhawn)
Properly CloseWrite() the client socket once done with stdin when using
TLS connection (this used to rely on an erroneous type assertion).
Fixes#8658.
Fixes#8642.
Signed-off-by: Arnaud Porterie <arnaud.porterie@docker.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Crosby <crosby.michael@gmail.com>
Sometimes other programs can bind on ports from our range, so we just
skip this ports on allocation.
Fixes#9293
Probably fixes#8714
Signed-off-by: Alexander Morozov <lk4d4@docker.com>
Prior to this patch, one would get the output of docker inspect xxx
as below:
user@server:/mnt$ docker inspect ubuntu
[{
"Architecture": "amd64",
...
"VirtualSize": 199257566
}
]user@server:/mnt$
The last ']' was on the same line with the prompt, i wonder if it is
really what we want it be, it is a little weird, so i add a '\n' to it.
Signed-off-by: Hu Keping <hukeping@huawei.com>
Updated the documentation to cover the installation of Docker on
openSUSE and on SUSE Linux Enterprise.
Docker-DCO-1.1-Signed-off-by: Flavio Castelli <fcastelli@suse.com> (github: flavio)
The documentation for EXPOSE seems to indicate, that EXPOSE is only relevant in
the context of links, which is not the case.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Atzen <jatzen@gmail.com>
