From e25b49c64f7a4ef2798f244f6c19e4c55c0df876 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Timothy Jaeryang Baek Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2025 13:40:52 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Update license.mdx --- docs/license.mdx | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/docs/license.mdx b/docs/license.mdx index e3bd9bb8..42b3275d 100644 --- a/docs/license.mdx +++ b/docs/license.mdx @@ -157,9 +157,9 @@ BSD-3 output/forks have **maximum flexibility**: as long as you keep the origina ### 6. Does this mean Open WebUI is “no longer open source”? -It's a great, and complicated, question, because **"open source" can mean many different things to many people**. +It's a great, and complicated, question, because "open source" can mean many different things to many people. -- **In the narrowest, most “by-the-book” sense, our new branding clause means Open WebUI v0.6.6+ isn’t OSI-certified "open source.”** +- In the narrowest, most “by-the-book” sense, our new branding clause means: **No, Open WebUI v0.6.6+ isn’t OSI-certified "open source.”** - Example: The OSI would not certify licenses that require you to keep original branding. - However, compared to what most people mean in practice , **“is the code available, can I use it, fork it, change it, build things with it, and not pay you or get a special key?”** , the answer is still a resounding **yes**.